• Me
    Publisher, you're on the right track. I agree with you about the government's surprising lack of insight. However, when you say that playing the markets is a quick way for wealthy to become wealthier you do not recognize the risk that is associated with each investment. It seems to the common person that your statement is true because we only hear about the Warren Buffets that consistently make wise investments. On the flipside is that investors stand to lose a lot of money, too...we don't hear about those so much. But investing in stocks generates money for a company that it will use to expand (and create more jobs). If the company does well you get a return on your investment, but if the company flops say "bye-bye" to your money. Unless of course the government bails you out, then the whole system goes to **** in a handbasket.
  • publisher
    I have been an advocate for long term investing, as the likes of Warren Buffett do constantly over a lifetime. Warren discourages speculative investing, which is why most people cannot even afford ONE share of Berkshire Hathaway. I am talking about the get rich quick schemes that a lot of "nouveau" wealth investors use, instead of applying the old-fashioned, respectful ways of investing in a company with potential, strong management, a product of service that has a need in the marketplace and is marketed correctly. Company's like that make profits, pay dividends and hire people. That don't live or die by the stroke of a Wall Street rumor or innuendo, losing 80% of their market value over night. I'm talking about investors and companies that stay ahead of the curve and don't get seduced by short term fata morgana profits. Dear ME, I have seen thousands over the years losing their lifelong savings in the market because they were seduced into a short trip on the roller coaster. America has become a country where the fate of even a well run company can be decided upon by sheeple investors, seduced by nimwit talking heads. It's an addictive game that lures too much money out of the market place that could make life for the small and medium business man a lot better and improve employment and productive output as a result. Of course I could be wrong....but I don't think so
  • Me
    Exactly.
  • Me
    You're absolutely right, Nick D. The unemployment rate in this country is extremely frustrating. Especially when you consider the amount of money being pumped into "job creation" by the federal government, which has produced how many jobs? Stimulus packages simply Do Not Work, as proved by FDR in the 30's and 40's, and by Lyndon Johnson, and Woodrow Wilson, et cetera et cetera... Remember the New Deal (more appropriately labeled "Raw Deal"), and other government stimulus projects deemed necessary by the liberal progressive mode of thought (which, by the way, is the same as Robin Hood's style). The simple fact is that rich people with money create jobs - not government fat cats and politicians. For Example, how many people does Sam Walton's legacy employ? I say let the private sector and the free market fix itself without the government intervention that has consistently proven not only ineffective throughout history, but destructive.
    - For more information on this topic open a history book.
  • publisher
    People with money used to create jobs, because satisfaction in life is created by action. Money is just a tool. Unfortunately in today's world a lot of people with money just want to make more money in the easiest way they know: playing the markets. It takes people like Richard Branson to have the vision and understanding that money is just a tool to help create dreams. And the creation process breeds jobs. His Virgin Galactic dream is a perfect example. Whether it's economically viable, time will tell. But it has already created 600 highly qualified jobs with hundreds more to come. The Wright brothers had a dream a century ago and now their dream employs millions of people worldwide. I have no problem with the government stimulating some job growth in particular market places. I have a problem with their complete lack of insight in how this task is best performed. It's too random, too unsupervised, too ineffective and leaves way too much space for funds disappearing in private pockets. And for that reason alone already, stimulus should be decentralized and local specific.
    To blindly make huge amounts of stimulus available within a limited amount of sectors (infrastructure, energy and tech) leaves any localized input beyond these sectors irrelevant and creates pockets of temporary high employment (and profit taking) and no longevity at all.
    It's not hard to promote sensible longterm employment opportunities, but it takes small and medium sized businesses to build this. Instead of loan facilities, give them credit overdraft facilities and a report card every quarter.
  • Absolutely correct, Me. Only free market and small business stimulus has proven to be effective.

    Problem is that the US compared to other countries has way too many regulations stifling job creation.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Water Wheel Art Gallery Psychic Reading By Linda Ronnie Stoots, Jr., Financial Advisor ACE Hardware, the helpful place, now open on Amelia Island Amelia Self Storage Fernandina Pool and Supply offers an array of products and services for your pool

advertisement

Latest comments

Recent Comments

advertisement

advertisement

SearchAmelia Gallery

004-maxi-video.jpg petanque-america-finals Petanque America 2009 Day 1 petanque-america-finals Nick Deonas Realty Woodland Cir shed petanque-america-finals